info@southlincslibdems.org.uk
We store cookies on your device to make sure we give you the best experience on this website. I'm fine with this - Turn cookies off
Switch to an accessible version of this website which is easier to read. (requires cookies)

Was Corbyn right to sack Owen Smith, after he advocated a referendum on the final terms of a Brexit deal?

March 27, 2018 1:13 PM
By Mark Argent in Liberal Democrat Voice

Mark ArgentOne answer is horror: there's a compelling case for asking the British public whether the Brexit that is negotiated is what they actually want - not least because the dishonest and contradictory messages from the Leave campaign mean that many who voted Leave will find a large gap between the deal that is offered and what they thought they had voted for.

Exit from BrexitBut an Exit From Brexit means healing the deep divisions that it has exposed, not just a narrow vote the other way in a referendum. That means bringing across many of those who voted Leave, and engaging with why they voted that way. Many voted Leave out of fear, and they still have reason to be afraid. That is particularly the case in the Labour heartlands.

For many on the Leave side, talk of a referendum on the terms smacks of a stitch-up from an establishment that is out of touch. There's a taste of this in the logic that a referendum is a bad idea because it encourages the EU27 to offer the UK a bad deal. The reality is that the EU27 have a duty to act in the best interests of the continuing members of the EU. The only time when they would have a duty to take note of the needs of the UK is if we stop Brexit still offers a way to get past "the establishment" to some bright new future.

The recent news and rumours around Cambridge Analytica may not help matters. On the Remain side, we are seeing this as further grounds for questioning the vote. But it can also be heard as "the establishment" finding another bizarre story to frustrate Brexit and take away their hope.

In party-political terms this is relatively easy for Liberal Democrats because there is such a strong correlation between support for Liberal Democrats and for EU membership. If anything, we need to be careful to keep faith with those who have joined us over our opposition to Brexit.

But for Labour it is much more complicated. Many of those who voted Leave out of fear are among their core supporters. Labour can do things to reach these people, but many of these link EU membership and the abandonment they felt under New Labour. Moving too quickly risks taking away not just the bright hopes of Brexit, but also the hopes of people who have put their trust in Jeremy Corbyn. Labour might need to hold fire and wait for more public pressure before switching to supporting a referendum on the terms.

Much as I would like to see an immediate exit from Brexit, what this actually points to is continued political chaos, where it is important to stay faithful to the fundamentals for both parties. For Liberal Democrats, internationalism in general, and support for EU membership in particular, are pretty basic. Our vision for improving life for the "left behind" is deeply entwined with our understanding of what EU membership offers.

But for Labour, staying with the fundamentals, might well need to be more around their self-image of themselves as the party of the working class. It is taking a while for the spotlight to fall on what the EU has done for workers' rights, to help economic stability and to support deprived areas, and for people to start realising that the likes of Jacob Rees-Mogg are not be the best allies of those who are struggling.

We do need to work together to find a brighter future than Brexit, and present polling shows there is still a long way to go. While it is difficult for Labour to be as clear as many of its supporters would like, Liberal Democrats have a role in putting the case, both for EU membership and for its relevance to the "left behind". That means reaching beyond core Liberal Democrat supporters For the moment, the internal struggles of the other parties seem to be mostly about the chaos of Brexit, and shouldn't deflect from the primary task of addressing Brexit and the divisions it has exposed.

* Mark Argent was the candidate in Hertford and Stortford in the 2017 General Election

John MarriottJohn Marriott - Former Liberal Democrat Lincolnshire County Council

Here I am, wading in again on this damned EU referendum debate! Isn't it fair to say that there a quite a few Labour MPs whose constituencies voted Leave? I still think that Corbyn (not Jeremy, David Raw, so you know what I think of him) and his crew really want out so as to reap the benefits, or so they think, if things go pear shaped, especially with the economy (siege comes to mind, when you can justify taking back control in more ways than one). Equally the Cash/Rees-Mogg lot would really like us to be like Singapore, but with the chewing gum etc. And the Lib Dems?

I need to get out more!